Not good enough for heaven

Warning: Trying to access array offset on value of type null in /customers/d/2/5/xianity.me/httpd.www/wp-content/plugins/really-simple-facebook-twitter-share-buttons/really-simple-facebook-twitter-share-buttons.php on line 318

There seems to be this popular misconception that Christians are “holier than thou” and that somehow by following God’s commandments we make ourselves better than everyone else and more worthy of getting to heaven.  The truth is almost the exact opposite: Christians are just people, who are as prone to being self-centred as the next person.

The cornerstone of Christian theology is that, by our own actions, we do not deserve to enter into heaven.  This is precisely why we need Jesus – his sacrifice on the cross paid the penalty we deserve for our sins (which is why Jesus’ last words on the cross are “It is finished”).  In dying, Jesus literally became the scapegoat for mankind and in rising again, Jesus proves that he is who he claimed to be: God incarnate.

This is grace, that rather than being given the punishment we deserve for our actions we are offered entry into heaven as a friend of Jesus, and shows how vast God’s love is for each of us.  The only question worth asking then is “do you accept Jesus’ sacrifice as atonement for your sins?”.

Finally, a word about those “holier than thou” Christians – once you truly realise how awesome, undeserved and deep God’s love is for us, the only possible response is to live a life dedicated to Him, serving others as Jesus commanded and showing them the same love that God shows us.

On the train to London on Thursday, the following popped into my head – if anyone wants to use it as the refrain for a song or hymn then feel free to share your ideas:

I’m not good enough for heaven,
But I know they’ll let me in,
For my faith resides in Jesus,
Who redeems me from my sin.

Casting Crowns

Warning: Trying to access array offset on value of type null in /customers/d/2/5/xianity.me/httpd.www/wp-content/plugins/really-simple-facebook-twitter-share-buttons/really-simple-facebook-twitter-share-buttons.php on line 318

I’m listening to a lot of Casting Crowns at the moment.  I really love their driving sound and heartfelt biblical lyrics to their songs.  It’s difficult to pick out any favourites but I’m going to highlight two songs in particular.

Courageous is an anthem for the modern Christian man and I think it is particularly apt for where we are as a church at present – seeking to engage in meaningful outreach that makes an impact on people in our communities.

Just another birthday is a heart-rending song that brings me close to tears listening to it.

I can definitely recommend you get more Casting Crowns in your life!

When I were a lad …

Warning: Trying to access array offset on value of type null in /customers/d/2/5/xianity.me/httpd.www/wp-content/plugins/really-simple-facebook-twitter-share-buttons/really-simple-facebook-twitter-share-buttons.php on line 318

Many of my fellow Christians seem to believe that the nation is suffering from moral decline and that Britain is no longer a Christian country.  So my question is simply this:

When exactly was the golden age of Christian morality?

Britain has a pretty bloody imperial history and significant wealth came from its slave trade, so presumably we have to rule out any time before the 19th century.  The Victorian era wasn’t exactly a great advert for Christian morality with swathes of the population in crippling poverty, the workhouses and child labour.  Of course, the first half of the 20th century is scarred by two world wars and up until at least the 1980s, society wasn’t exactly a bastion of gender, racial, religious or sexual equality (and to be fair we’ve still got a long way to go with these issues).  But then, presumably the last 30 years of rampant consumerism, wars over oil and political dishonesty form part of what the critics deplore as unChristian behaviour.

I’d appreciate your thoughts and comments.

Does nature abhor a miracle?

Warning: Trying to access array offset on value of type null in /customers/d/2/5/xianity.me/httpd.www/wp-content/plugins/really-simple-facebook-twitter-share-buttons/really-simple-facebook-twitter-share-buttons.php on line 318

One of the strongest objections to the Christian faith is that it must be legendary because the events it celebrates are unscientific. In particular, the bible records many miracles throughout its Old and New Testaments, most notably the resurrection of the crucified Jesus.

Crucially, such an objection is based on a false premise. Science and the scientific method can never tell us what is and is not possible. All that science can tell us is what things might typically happen in a given situation and hopefully why. That’s because the scientific method is based on experimentation and observation, so anything that is not a common enough occurrence to be observed is unlikely to make it into the model.

Now, by their very nature, miracles are exceedingly rare and seem to defy the natural order – we wouldn’t bother calling them miracles if they didn’t! Even in the bible, which claims to be a record of God’s relationship with the Jews, miracles are not commonplace. Of course, they feature prominently because they are the sort of things worth recording when they happen, but they provoked the same sense of awe and reverence as they would today precisely because they were totally unexpected.

In fact, most scientists would agree that science cannot possibly predict everything. Indeed, one of the central tenets of certain interpretations of quantum mechanics is that everything is possible, it’s just that once you’ve done the calculations most events have a practically zero probability of being observed.

It is right that we should exhibit an informed scepticism about events that seem contrary to our own experiences and seem to defy scientific principles. But as science can never tell us what happened at any given time and place, we need to use historical methods, which include studying writings about the events and examining any archaeological evidence that might be available.

So with all this in mind, I urge you to take a fresh look at those miracles you thought could not have possibly happened and with all the historical and archaeological evidence available to you, reexamine your conclusions. I’m not asking that you agree with me, just that you try to get as complete a picture as the evidence will allow.

Happy hunting!

An Easter riddle

Warning: Trying to access array offset on value of type null in /customers/d/2/5/xianity.me/httpd.www/wp-content/plugins/really-simple-facebook-twitter-share-buttons/really-simple-facebook-twitter-share-buttons.php on line 318

As another Easter passes and Christians around the world remember the events that form the bedrock of our faith, I am reminded again that everything hangs or falls on the historicity of the death and resurrection of Jesus Christ.

My challenge to you therefore is simply this: what happened on that first Easter Sunday, that turned a bunch of cowardly followers of the crucified Jesus into zealous evangelists who would proclaim Jesus as the Son of God across the Western world and would all (save one) go to horrific martyrs’ deaths for their faith?

May God bless you and your families this Easter!

None so blind …

Warning: Trying to access array offset on value of type null in /customers/d/2/5/xianity.me/httpd.www/wp-content/plugins/really-simple-facebook-twitter-share-buttons/really-simple-facebook-twitter-share-buttons.php on line 318

There is a traditional joke in which a person who is lost asks for directions – “Well, I wouldn’t start from here …”, comes the reply. Of course, we have to start from where we are, but gaining a real understanding of that starting point is key in helping us to identify the direction of travel and understand the journey ahead.

Like anything involving real people, real data and the reconstruction of historical events, Christianity is messy.  I can understand the temptation to cut through the messiness with a clean clear-cut theology that becomes the guiding principle when we don’t know how to interpret the data.  However, for too many Christians and critics that theology can become the plank of wood that blinds us to really considering the evidence, because we become too quick to dismiss anything that doesn’t fit with our world view.

Before we come to consider the claims of Christianity and its implications for our lives, I would urge each of us to examine our prior assumptions, our starting point if you like, because these will colour the conclusions we can reach. Just as the Christian who begins with the claim that the bible is infallible will never acknowledge the errors and inconsistencies within its pages, so too the critic who declares that all miracles are a priori impossible is destined to reject the case for Christ’s resurrection.

Fortunately, Christian truth does not require scripture to be infallible – it is enough that the evidence is sufficient to lead people to Christ.

Hume’s argument for atheism

Warning: Trying to access array offset on value of type null in /customers/d/2/5/xianity.me/httpd.www/wp-content/plugins/really-simple-facebook-twitter-share-buttons/really-simple-facebook-twitter-share-buttons.php on line 318

David Hume proposed the following argument against the existence of God:

Suffering exists in the world.
If God exists then He is both omnipotent and loving.
If God cannot eliminate suffering then He is not omnipotent.
If God will not eliminate suffering then He is not loving.
Hence, God does not exist.

What do you think of Hume’s argument?  Are the inferences Hume makes valid?  (Note that whether or not you agree with the conclusion has no bearing on the validity, or otherwise, of the argument!)

Feel free to share further arguments for or against the existence of God.

Science vs Christianity

Warning: Trying to access array offset on value of type null in /customers/d/2/5/xianity.me/httpd.www/wp-content/plugins/really-simple-facebook-twitter-share-buttons/really-simple-facebook-twitter-share-buttons.php on line 318

As Christians, we have to be able to answer the question: “Why Christianity, as oppose to any other religion or non-religious belief?”.  For me, it is not a question of choosing a system of beliefs or a theology with which I feel comfortable – that would be putting the cart before the horse.

Christianity is first and foremost an evidence-based faith – the historical evidence points to the existence of a man, whom the Greek-speaking world named Jesus, who claimed to be the son of God, performed miracles, taught about God and heaven, and was raised from the dead precisely as he claimed he would be.  The challenge is to construct a world-view that fits with these facts, which is the challenge that the writers of the New Testament and the early church took on.

However, there is a continual challenge that all of us who wish Christianity to retain that privileged status must face – in light of continuing developments in our understanding of scientific, historical and literary evidence we must continue to re-evaluate the evidence for our faith and, where necessary, adapt our theology to fit the facts rather than denying the facts to suit our theology.

The consequence of failure to engage with this challenge is that Christianity becomes just another religion ….

The apprentice

Warning: Trying to access array offset on value of type null in /customers/d/2/5/xianity.me/httpd.www/wp-content/plugins/really-simple-facebook-twitter-share-buttons/really-simple-facebook-twitter-share-buttons.php on line 318

I love reading testimonies from people who have come to faith in Christ and I am always struck by the diversity of these experiences. As a scientist, the stories that involve a sceptic weighing up the evidence for/against Jesus being the Son of God and coming down in favour, are those that resonate most with me.

Whilst there is a lot of commonality with my own experience, one of the joys of being a Christian is knowing that we have a personal relationship with God and that God makes His presence known to each of us in different ways, as the variation in testimonies bears out.

One of the common threads in all these experiences appears to be that much of our life is an apprenticeship, so that when the invitation from God comes for us to know Him, we might accept and make the most of that opportunity. For me, that apprenticeship was through the study of science, interrogating evidence and in logical reasoning. For C.S. Lewis, it was via the study of ethics and philosophy and his path to enlightenment was via reasoning about universal morality.

In this respect, God reveals Himself to be the perfect teacher: building on what we already know; meeting us where we are; and inspiring us to dig that little bit deeper in our search for truth.

As disciples of Christ, that apprenticeship continues for the rest of our lives – indeed, we would argue that this apprenticeship is the very purpose of life.

Recommended reads

Warning: Trying to access array offset on value of type null in /customers/d/2/5/xianity.me/httpd.www/wp-content/plugins/really-simple-facebook-twitter-share-buttons/really-simple-facebook-twitter-share-buttons.php on line 318

Here’s a list of books I really recommend you read, whether you are looking to build your faith or understand the arguments and beliefs that you may wish to refute:

1) Well, the bible obviously, but if you are starting out then Mark’s gospel is the most accessible and Acts is the story of what happened immediately after Jesus’ death and resurrection … and if you want to refute Christianity then hold your nose and read them anyway to find out what outrageous things we Christians believe!

2) Josh McDowell’s “Evidence that demands a verdict” is the Christian apologist’s handbook and well worth having on every thinking Christian’s bookshelf … and again, if you want to argue against Christianity these are the arguments you need to engage with – so read it, build up your case and let’s have a chat about it …

3) Lee Strobel’s “The case for Christ” is the story of a journalist who goes out to demolish the outrageous claims of Christianity, but ends up believing them.

4) C.S. Lewis’ “Mere Christianity” and “Surprised by Joy”. The former is Lewis’ case for Christianity and is a rewritten compilation of his series of radio broadcasts on the subject; the latter is Lewis’ autobiography detailing his conversion to Christianity. Now I can’t say I personally agree with Lewis’ argument for Christianity, starting from the basis of universal morality, but as one of the foremost Christian apologists of the 20th century his works are full of fascinating discussions and insights.

5) Charles Pellegrino’s “Return to Sodom and Gomorrah” is an agnostic archaeologist’s take on the scientific evidence regarding the events recorded in the bible’s earliest histories.

I hope you enjoy them and feel free to add any suggestions you may have!